Imprecise Beliefs in a Principal Agent Model∗

نویسنده

  • Luca Rigotti
چکیده

This paper presents a principal-agent model where the agent has multiple, or imprecise, beliefs. We model this situation formally by assuming the agent’s preferences are incomplete. One can interpret this multiplicity as limited knowledge of the surrounding environment. In this setting, incentives need to be robust to the agent’s beliefs. We study whether robustness implies simplicity. Under mild conditions, we show the unique optimal contract has a two-wage structure. That is, all output levels are divided into two groups, and the optimal incentive scheme pays the same amount for all output levels in each group. When monotonicity occurs, this is a flat payment plus bonus contract. Then, a two-state two-action framework can be thought of as a reduced form of the original model. We solve explicitly the principal’s problem in this case, and discuss some implications of our model for firm ownership. JEL Codes: D82, D81, D23 ∗I thank Truman Bewley and Ben Polak for invaluable advice; Aldo Rustichini Dirk Bergemann, Subir Bose, Simon Grant, Georg Kirchsteiger, June K. Lee, David Pearce, Matthew Ryan, Chris Shannon, and Dolf Talman gave useful comments at various stages of this work; I also thank seminar audiences at Arizona State, CORE, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, ITAM, Stanford, Tilburg, and Yale. †E-mail: [email protected]

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Contracting for Information under Imperfect Commitment

We study optimal contracting under imperfect commitment in a model with an uninformed principal and an informed agent. The principal can commit to pay the agent for his advice but retains decision-making authority. Under an optimal contract, the principal should (a) never induce the agent to fully reveal what he knows— even though this is feasible— and (b) never pay the agent for imprecise info...

متن کامل

Why Does it Matter that Beliefs and Valuations be Correctly Represented ? ¤

This paper contains an analysis of a simple principal-agent problem illustrating possible problems that may arise when the prinicpal ascribes to the agent subjective probabilities and utilities that are implied by the subjective expected utility model but do not represent the agent’s beliefs and valuations. In particular, it is possible that an incentive contract designed by the principal induc...

متن کامل

Why Does it Matter that Beliefs and Valuations

This paper contains an analysis of a simple principal-agent problem illustrating possible problems that may arise when the prinicpal ascribes to the agent subjective probabilities and utilities that are implied by the subjective expected utility model but do not represent the agent’s beliefs and valuations. In particular, it is possible that an incentive contract designed by the principal induc...

متن کامل

Non-discretionary imprecise data in efficiency Measurement

This paper introduces discretionary imprecise data in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and discusses the efficiency evaluation of Decision Making Units (DMUs) with non-discretionary imprecise data. Then, suggests a method for evaluation the efficiency of DMUs with non-discretionary imprecise data. When some inputs and outputs are imprecise and non-discretionary, the DEA model becomes non-linear ...

متن کامل

Knightian uncertainty and moral hazard

This paper presents a principal-agent model in which the agent has imprecise beliefs. We model this situation formally by assuming the agent’s preferences are incomplete as in Bewley (1986) [2]. In this setting, incentives must be robust to Knightian uncertainty. We study the implications of robustness for the form of the resulting optimal contracts. We give conditions under which there is a un...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001